a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • en 🇳🇴 English Polski Español Français 中文 (Chinese Simplified) Türkçe
  • jmb514
  • date joined
    March 6, 2018

Following (0)

Followers (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Arguments
  • Fallacy Reports

Google returning a page about “abortion” to a search for “murder” is valid.

Shouldn't Google judge the quality of the information provided by users? Otherwise, their algorithm could be manipulated to show skewed results.

Google returning a page about “abortion” to a search for “murder” is valid.

Google's ranking algorithm may be misinterpreting the context of how abortion and murder are related or their algorithm may have been deliberately manipulated to show this result.

It is ethical to use personal data for targeting political advertising.

Users are typically informed through complicated EULAs that go unread. How can a service effectively communicate how user data is going to be used in a concise but also complete way? (Transparency paradox)

It is ethical to use personal data for targeting political advertising.

Services that collect data have an ethical duty to inform users on what data is being collected and how it will be used.

Social media are an overall benefit to society.

Social media can also distract from important topics or can be used to raise awareness for harmful causes

Social media are an overall benefit to society.

Social media can hurt a user's ability to maintain focus and consume traditional content like literature

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback