a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NOR 🏴 DE πŸ‡΅πŸ‡± PL πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· AR 🏳 FR 🍎 latin
  • mackerman
  • date joined
    Oct. 13, 2015

Following (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Arguments
  • Fallacy Reports

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

A housing of homeless could cause criminal problems on holy ground. (arguments/fighting/stealing)

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

It would solve a lot of society's problems regarding homeless. No more starvation. Homeless could spend their days trying to find solutions to their current situation instead of begging for change.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

It will be difficult to monitor whether or not a tax-exempt church is actually providing these services.
1 supporter.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

Government provided amenities could also be provided at lower rates to assist with keeping costs down to tax-exempt churches.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

The tax-exempt decision should be made by a collective voting from the current church-goers at the particular establishment.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

Churches in wealthier neighborhoods would most likely forgo the tax-exempt status. They could afford it.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

Homeless convening and territorializing around a church could create a dangerous territory for regular church goers.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

Cost of homeless care (shower, food, and clothes) will be covered by money saved through tax-exemption.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

A large amount of real-estate is owned by religious institutions. They have the land to provide shelter for homeless.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

It's a typical trait of religions to be required to take humanist actions for the less fortunate by God/Godess.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

The act of providing special treatment to religious institutions with tax-exempt status is already a breach of Church/State separation.
2 supporter.

Religious institutions should be required to house/feed homeless if wanting tax-exempt status.

Separation of Church/State would prohibit such actions.

Men and Women are fundamentally different. Gender is not just a construct of society

The first sentence is correct. The second is not. Pink is not feminine. Blue is not masculine. The moment you are born you are assigned one of these colors based solely on your genitals, which you have no control over. A color will modify your interactions with other humans your entire childhood.
3 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Fallacy Of Slippery Slope

PC is better than consoles

Optimization is always ideal, regardless of platform. With PC you don't know the limitations of the customer. They typically won't know either. You WANT your product as small as possible. With a console you know that your product will work on one system the same as any other.

PC is better than consoles

They are NOT better in one key aspect: Development. Consoles have standardized hardware, which is something developers need to solve debugging issues. PCs can have thousands of hardware combinations that make across-the-board bug free versions of the game actually impossible.
3 supporter.

Abortion should be illegal.

The hypocrisy you're describing doesn't apply here. The defining line of when a conglomeration of cells becomes a person is hazy. Most abortions happen well before the cells take shape and create a functioning human. The few that happen late-term are because this child has died in the womb.

Life is pointless

Perspective of scale drives this argument. "Pointless" is defined as "lack of use or purpose" On a universal scale the argument is true. On a personal scale, most parents give birth to provide themselves with a purpose. This gives a point to the child's life. The shift of dependence.

All religion should be abolished

Other than that final sentence your statement is valid. Please don't make generalizations.

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback