a
about
blog
register
login
English
Polski
Español
Français
中文 (Chinese Simplified)
Türkçe
Overview
Premises
Fallacy Reports
Most active channels
Life
Religion
Most discussed users
password45
krishsucks
frkoglu
zdimension
kataquax
Most supported premises
It is impossible to prove if God exists.
"He has the power to do something" does not prove that it is what he has done. I have the power to break your nose but I have not done so, have I?
1 supporter.
It is impossible to prove if God exists.
How do you define proof? Current secular science decided long time ago that any data that has the potential to take us beyond what we see will be ignored on the basis that the reality can only be defined as something that can only be observed through senses. God is beyond what we see.
1 supporter.
It is impossible to prove if God exists.
I don't need to argue for "some" ideas of God; I am arguing for my definition of God. If my argument does not address someone else's definition of God, it is not a problem in and of itself. Plus, you cannot argue for God, who is not absolute, necessary and self-existing.
1 supporter.
It is impossible to prove if God exists.
When we prove that God exists, we also disprove that he does not eliminate any proof of Himself.
1 supporter.
It is impossible to prove if God exists.
This is called solipsism and it is complete nonsense. To deny any form of proof does not have any proof itself and it is nothing but a claim.
1 supporter.
It is impossible to prove if God exists.
I will consider the additional definitions as long as I agree that they truly represent the thing I am defining. Someone calling an item blanket does not necessitate that I should accept it.
1 supporter.