a
about
blog
register
login
🇳🇴 Nodic (english)
Standards
🇵🇱 Polish
Español
France 🇫🇷
中文 (Chinese Simplified)
Türkçe
Overview
Premises
Arguments
Fallacy Reports
Most active channels
Better Than
Programming
Most discussed users
inter
Most supported premises
Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.
Static typing leads to large codebases with more files and classes compared to dynamically typed languages. It also forces the continual creation of logic which has nothing to do with the actual problem being solved. And which have to be maintained too.
1 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Fallacy Of False Cause
Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.
I would say it is not the case at all. The logic/yak shaving ratio is much lower for dynamically typed languages. Properly name-spaced and unit-tested, they should be easier or much easier to maintain. Also - refactoring is much simpler in dynamic languages.
1 supporter.