a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • 🇳🇴 Nodic (english) Standards 🇵🇱 Polish Español France 🇫🇷 中文 (Chinese Simplified) Türkçe
  • psvensson
  • psvensson
  • twitter
    @psvensson
  • date joined
    Dec. 4, 2015

Following (0)

Followers (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Arguments
  • Fallacy Reports

Most active channels

  • Better Than
  • Programming

Most discussed users

  • inter

Most supported premises

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

Static typing leads to large codebases with more files and classes compared to dynamically typed languages. It also forces the continual creation of logic which has nothing to do with the actual problem being solved. And which have to be maintained too.
1 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Fallacy Of False Cause

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

I would say it is not the case at all. The logic/yak shaving ratio is much lower for dynamically typed languages. Properly name-spaced and unit-tested, they should be easier or much easier to maintain. Also - refactoring is much simpler in dynamic languages.
1 supporter.

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback