The blue pill would have been a better choice (Matrix)

"Ignorance" and or "Bliss" is a denial of objective reality that inhibits the survival of our species.

Income should be equal

Inherited property is a form of generational resource accumulation, which is not compatible with the idea of equal opportunity. Also, one is not "caring for children" by hoarding resources generation after generation. The above would be an example of with-holding resources from the general public.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

The "class struggle" was not regulated prior to the American Civil War. This lack of regulation resulted in slavery being a legal practice in the United States. Without strict oversight, the greed of some individuals has no end, resulting in widespread exploitation and injustice.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

Your conclusion is that class struggles should not be regulated based on the incomplete and biased assessment of what the Heritage Foundation calls "The War on Poverty". If the "class struggle" is not regulated, the wealthy will continue to exploit the American people, as they have always done.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

You claim that "one side needs to have more control in the form of ownership for wealth to be meaningful". This is a loaded claim that requires an example or some form of evidence. It is also unclear what you mean by the terms "control in the form of ownership" and "meaningful".

There should be a market for organs (both organs of deceased and extra organs of living, like kidney)

Severe violation of human rights.
1 supporter.

There should be a market for organs (both organs of deceased and extra organs of living, like kidney)

Then those who have more wealth could purchase vast amounts of organs and retain them in storage. Therefore, those with more wealth would have control over the supply and demand of organs. The poor man's survival would ultimately be at the discretion of the wealthy. Sounds like a horror film.
2 supporter.

One can not "own" a person, place, thing, or idea.

Just because an object has unique characteristics does not imply that said object "owns" said characteristics. The characteristics of an object simply represent how said object exists in nature. I understand your point, but I believe there is a distinction between "property" and "characteristic".
3 supporter.

Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.

Please watch the video below. These data show the level to which the lower and working classes have been exploited under American capitalism.

Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.

Under capitalism in America, the current level of income and wealth inequality is similar to the proportion of wealth owned by a slave compared to a slave owner in the times of slavery. The poor get just what they need to survive, while the upper class capitalizes off of the poor man's labor.
4 supporter.

Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.

With capitalism, the potential for working and lower class citizens to be exploited is high. Currently in America, the capital gains of the economy are being hoarded by the top 1% of the population. Ultimately, this translates to the lower and working classes being drastically under-compensated.
5 supporter.

Making money is more important than enjoying one's work.

To live, you need food, water, and shelter (depending of where you live), not money. Money is a tool in which to acquire the above resources, but it is not necessary to have money in order to survive.
1 supporter.

One can not "own" a person, place, thing, or idea.

The terms that imply ownership (my, mine, yours, theirs, etc.) are subjective representations. The statement "this is my apple" is an opinion. In order for the above statement to be objectively true, it would have to read as "this is an apple that I use". "To own" = opinion, "to use" = fact.
2 supporter.

One can not "own" a person, place, thing, or idea.

Unfortunately, I would agree. One can not realistically own the organs within a body, but rather, one simply uses the organs within a body for means of survival. Human rights are agreed upon in order to protect ourselves from the crude possibility of organ harvesting for capital gain.
1 supporter.

One can not "own" a person, place, thing, or idea.

You seem to be defining the term property as a "characteristic", rather than my intended definition of property, which is "something that is owned". Also, each of your examples are over-simplifications. Ex. There are many reasons why a leaf exists, perhaps most importantly because there is sunlight.
1 supporter.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

The free market is a sort of "free for all" that disproportionately benefits those who already have a great sum of wealth in which to make investments. The free market is a one-legged race where those who are already wealthy and powerful get to use both of their legs.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

The free market allows for monopolies to exist. Once a business becomes established within a market, that business can use the profit that it had accumulated to buy out their competitors. More wealth, more lawyers, more lobbyists, more loopholes, etc. Small businesses have little to no chance.
2 supporter.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

No, one does not need to have more control in the form of property rights for wealth to be meaningful. People can have an equal amount of wealth and still be able to exchange various forms of property in a productive manner. Capitalism is allowing for wealth to be used as influence (SuperPACs).
2 supporter.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

Under capitalism, goods and services have the potential of being harmful and counterproductive to the public good. Ex. The combustion of oil products provided by the fossil fuel industry is contributing to climate change and ultimately degrading the quality of our planet. Would this be productive?
1 supporter.

watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People

Capitalism does not require that a good or service fulfill a reasonable need. Often times, goods that serve little to no reasonable purpose find their way to the market. Such goods and services are an inefficient allocation of resources. Ex. The French Fry Holder (among countless others).