Most active channels

Most discussed users

Most supported premises

There should be inbuilt definitions for logical fallacies in arguman

the names of logical fallacies are not descriptive enough
18 supporter.

If a man gets a woman pregnant under the impression she was on birthcontrol, and she wishes to keep the child but he does not, then he should be able to opt out of any legal responsibilities

By applying it to himself.
5 supporter.

A creator must exist

If we can't possibly understand his existence, then we should discontinue the idea that he is a creator. Creation implies causation. Cause and effect in our universe are always in this order, in this beings special dimension this concept does not exist.
4 supporter.

If a man gets a woman pregnant under the impression she was on birthcontrol, and she wishes to keep the child but he does not, then he should be able to opt out of any legal responsibilities

There are never any guarantees, every actions has a latent uncertainty. The problem with this situation is, the man didn't take all the precautions available. He didn't even take the precaution of wearing a condom. If the man did not want a pregnancy then it is his responsibility to prevent that.
3 supporter.

Not evereyone should have the right to have children

Natural selection is not relevant in today's society with our medicines, community values and interventions. Unless you consider our own actions as part of natural selection, in which case we must actively shape it rather than assume that evolution will take care of it.
3 supporter.

arguman > r/changemyview

Fallacies in this website should not be viewed as conclusions that the argument is wrong, but a 'red flag' or prompt to suggest to readers that it may be fallacious. Those who come here are attempting to think critically, analyzing if an argument is truly fallacious is part of the process.
3 supporter.

30 years ago, we're romanticizing islamic culture via media like Alladdin and a 1001 nights. Today, the view has grown skewed. Has Islam changed or our perception of Islam?

this is not really a premise because it cannot be answers by any of sender premises.
3 supporter.

If a man gets a woman pregnant under the impression she was on birthcontrol, and she wishes to keep the child but he does not, then he should be able to opt out of any legal responsibilities

I said the decision of a child began with the father and ended with the mother. The decision to have sex knowing the possibility of the child. Knowing the possibility that the decision would be left to the mother.
2 supporter.

If a man gets a woman pregnant under the impression she was on birthcontrol, and she wishes to keep the child but he does not, then he should be able to opt out of any legal responsibilities

the actions of the man should take this situation into consideration, firstly by assess whether the birth control was applied competently and faithfully and secondly the consequences if they were not. This foresight makes the offspring his responsibility. (Moral/ethical argument vs legal)
1 supporter.

The Doctor in Doctor Who should never be female.

this does not mean that changes in the dynamic are bad, remember that this Doctor Who is a reboot, The show has already gone through a metamorphosis once already, not to mention each change of doctors/companios. Who's to say that a female doctor would be bad, it may be fun with new jokes and devices
1 supporter.