a
/Better Than
sender
noah1786
source
Unspecified
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
"x is
better than
y" is a flawed form of
argument
The argument have no premises.
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
Neutral support and objection rate.
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Argument
is an Evidence
Trolls are productive to argument analysis
You cannot argue against Black-face comedies being prevalent without also arguing against The Big Bang Theory TV series being prevalent too (Which it has been since 2007).
Arguing whether God exists or not is useless to everyone.
By law fulltime work should provide a living wage above the poverty line.
Fallacies don't always imply an argument is wrong.
In Argüman, any 'however' statement could also be a 'but' statement.
Darren can win an argument against himself
Statement
is a Message
argüman should implement meta-argumentation. For example, we need to be able to add arguments in favour of / against the claim that a given argument is a fallacy.
Darren can win an argument against himself
The users tliohottesvirgi, ymcbayrodr & torsethnest should be banned forever and the arguments they created should be deleted
"Argument" should be translated as "论点"
Evidentialism makes the fewest possible assumption, and based on the previous argument, is therefore the most reasonable and effective view.
A monument of the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the Texas state capitol does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
This statement is true
Better Than
is a Comparison
A ranked-choice voting system is better than first-past-the-post.
Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.
Having the striking surface on top of a cajón is better than having it on the side.
python is better than matlab
Ignorance is better than Knowledge
Loan model is better than grants model
Microservices are better than Monolith
Discussion
is a Speech
Your first Arguman should be a test to understand its usefulness before you apply it to a large discussion topic.
Definitions are best kept 'loose'/open in discussions
Those who create discussions on arguman are not doing so for the sake of discussion but rather as a plea for their beliefs to be heard
Saving our nation with two magical words: socialized prostitution.
Arguman's character limit for a premise is good for discourse
The word "continent" is so loosely defined we should stop using it.
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
Comparison
is an Examination
penguins are inherently assholes for making humans look ugly by comparison
noah1786
noah1786